Skip to content

Victory Publicity

13

Comments

  • edited May 2015
    HONDO said:

    The following are from 1953 newspaper advertisements. Take note of what the Sydney Truth critic wrote in the Sunday the 25th of January, 1953 paper. He said ''This film startled Sydney audiences 19 years ago --- it may do the same again  ... '' He didn't say 4 years ago he said 19 which would make this 1953 release the correct year to be startled again and not 1949.

    imageimage

    From Sydney Truth Sunday the 25th of January, 1953.

    image

    Newcastle newspaper advertisement  1953 also.


    Hondo




    I can see both them advertisements are from NSW. If there was a Australia wide release in 1953 I'd like to see newspaper advertisements from other major cities, especially from the state of Victoria.



    I was going to respond but I believe David has presented my facts and thoughts on the matter very well along with his own thoughts and delivered a strong summation and hopefully now we will move on leaving one to believe whatever they may as to when the the films re-release happened in Australia. Hondo
  • Come on Reg, you got to see reason and logic - surely the burden on proof is now on you, you prove it was 1949, we've provided ample evidence it could not be 1949 and is 1953.
  • Found an RKO one sheet:

    image
  • But wait, there's more...for those looking for even more proof by way of evidence of a re-release in Victoria, (and this is not the only one):

    Women's Weekly, January 28th 1953, The Palace (20-30 Bourke St, Melbourne VIC 3000) - note the use of the word 're-release' ;)

    image


    image



  • What was judge Judy's ruling? This is key to the matter at hand...
  • =)) 1953 it is

  • Switching from King Kong  to a  great Hitchcock poster.

    image

    Hondo


  • David said:
    Come on Reg, you got to see reason and logic - surely the burden on proof is now on you, you prove it was 1949, we've provided ample evidence it could not be 1949 and is 1953.
    Take it easy tiger no need to get your knickers in a twist.
  • David said:
    But wait, there's more...for those looking for even more proof by way of evidence of a re-release in Victoria, (and this is not the only one):

    Women's Weekly, January 28th 1953, The Palace (20-30 Bourke St, Melbourne VIC 3000) - note the use of the word 're-release' ;)

    image


    image



    This is what I wanted to see, more proof/evidence that there was a nation wide release in 1953. Good work David!
  • HONDO said:
    As far as I'm aware this is the R49 release daybill. I highly doubt it's a 53' release as the artwork and colour tones are in line with other 40s victory publicity daybills. Also there is a collector I believe who is from Australia who claims to have seen the 1949 screening of this film in Australia with this poster being used back then.


    I have checked  Australian newspaper classifieds for 1949 without finding a single re-release advertisement . On the other hand there are countless classified advertisements around Australia in 1953.

    Hondo




    HumphreyBogart said -


    This is what I wanted to see, more proof/evidence that there was a nation wide release in 1953. Good work David!



    I stated from the beginning the film was a 1953 release and said the film had a nationwide release in 1953 as clearly mentioned above previously. I would have thought one's word would have been good enough without congratulating someone else for posting information I was happy to post myself but silly me thought my word was good enough. Note I said'' around Australia in 1953''.

    Hondo


    P.S. It was good work David
    .




  • Good work from you to Hondo! :)
  • edited July 2015

    Wonder if there is a full colour version?

    image

  • Wonder if there is a full colour version?

    image

    There is good news and there is some bad news.  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     The bad news is I don't know and as it is such a rare title you will probably never know if you have the only version printed or it is a companion piece to a colour version.

    The good news is it is a Fox 1935 release and by the next year Fox was 20th Century Fox so this means the poster was printed for the first release.  

  • Maybe me and the girls should pull out the colour pencils? ;)   As always, thanks Lawrence...
  • Maybe me and the girls should pull out the colour pencils? ;)   As always, thanks Lawrence...

    That would no doubt increase the value 10 fold!

    $-)

  • Great Shock poster. Love the image of Lynn Bari.
  • Yeah, but shame they couldn't put an image of Price on it...not sure who that fella in the top right is. ;)
  • Wonder if there is a full colour version?

    image

    Hell, can you imagine how lovely it would be?!
  • Two daybills of the one design from 1936 just before Fox was to become 20th Century Fox. Both obviously first release with the Fox logo on them. In my mind after seeing these images there would have had to been a full colour daybill for Dressed To Thrill which a copy will hopefully turn up one day.Before anyone points out the duotone poster is a stock poster I am aware of this.


    imageimage



  • Matt, the Duotone is a stock poster...

    :D
  • David said:
      


    The above The Monte Carlo Story ( USA 1957 ) poster would have been one of the final film posters printed by Victory Publicity in Australia.
  • Rather than clog up the Robin Hood thread, here are the article...I'll post more as I get time else everything else up tonight.

    From March of 1933 - Everyone's:

  • Fascinating Ves!

    Now someone find out where these exchanges were and go for a treasure hunt ?
  • edited August 2018
    October 1933:







    December 1933:



    January 1934:


    March 1934:


    September 1937:


  • What a great resource this is turning out to be. 

    Seems like over the course of the last few years the history of Aussie paper has really started to come to light through everyone's continued interest and contributions
  • I reckon Ves is morphing from collector and Queen of movie posters to dedicated film historian!
Sign In or Register to comment.






Logo

For movie poster collectors who know...

@ 2025 Vintage Movie Posters Forum, All rights reserved.

Contact us

info@vintagemoviepostersforum.com

Get In Touch