Skip to content

Worst artwork

124678

Comments


  • Hard to tell if  the man is Lon Chaney, Raymond Burr or Tom Conway but the most likely answer is Tom Conway. 1960's RFD daybill with the original 1950's Ray Films release being better but that isn't saying much.

    image


    Hondo




  • Matt said:
    The fact that people have these posters is disturbing enough....
    Er, sorry...how many versions of Navarone do we have now?  Glass houses, stones...etc. You fill in the missing bits  ;)

  • image

    Hondo


  • Matt said:
    The fact that people have these posters is disturbing enough....
    Er, sorry...how many versions of Navarone do we have now?  Glass houses, stones...etc. You fill in the missing bits  ;)
    Apparently he's still one short of a complete set

  • imageimage

    Hondo

  • oh dear...
  • Matt said:
    The fact that people have these posters is disturbing enough....
    Er, sorry...how many versions of Navarone do we have now?  Glass houses, stones...etc. You fill in the missing bits  ;)
    I don't have the duo tone Navarone, got to draw the line somewhere.
    :P
  • Matt said:
    I don't have the duo tone Navarone, got to draw the line somewhere.

    Or a colour AU1SH either?
  • Yes, the elusive colour one sheet. One day I'll find it. [-O<
  • Matt said:
    Yes, the elusive colour one sheet. One day I'll find it. [-O<                 \\                                                                                                                   
    In the meantime you will have to settle
    for the reissues one sheet. 

    Hondo
  • Nope, it's a duo tone also, from what I've seen.
  • HONDO said:
    Matt said:
    Yes, the elusive colour one sheet. One day I'll find it. [-O<                 \\                                                                                                                   
    In the meantime you will have to settle
    for the reissues one sheet. 

    Hondo
    Never settle on second best when the original is bound to be out there with your name on it
  • The yellow, black & white poster is the only Australian one sheet I have ever sighted. There must be an original colour one sheet out there somewhere. If and when it turns up on eBay with all your interest Matt & David they will be asking a small fortune for it and if it is auctioned on eMovieposter there will be a bidding war between you two.


    Hondo

  • I think the yellow black and white is a NZ poster???
  • Matt said:
    I think the yellow black and white is a NZ poster???

    Nope. It has a For Gereral Exhibition censorship  rating on it. From memory alone I believe it was printed by the mid to late printer of 20th Century Fox posters Royalstone Prints Pty Ltd 


    Hlondo

  • edited June 2015
    HONDO said:

    The yellow, black & white poster is the only Australian one sheet I have ever sighted. There must be an original colour one sheet out there somewhere. If and when it turns up on eBay with all your interest Matt & David they will be asking a small fortune for it and if it is auctioned on eMovieposter there will be a bidding war between you two.


    I have heard it discussed in dulcet tones that legendary poster they call the last Guns of Navarone AU1SH left in existence, and in some sea ports (like the naval yards at Williamstown) shadowy persons unknown have been heard to sing sea shanties about the colour one; but EMP? Fooey, too many prices being driven down there, I doubt any Aussie collector would put it up there or on eBay - that said, I am not am not interested in adding it to my collection, but I am sure it would be expensive, bloody expensive...


    HONDO said:
    Nope. It has a For Gereral Exhibition censorship  rating on it. From memory alone I believe it was printed by the mid to late printer of 20th Century Fox posters Royalstone Prints Pty Ltd 
    GON was Columbia, so more likely a Burton, printed with a Not Suitable?
  • :ar!
  • edited June 2015

    Matt said:
    I think the yellow black and white is a NZ poster???

    Nope. It has a For Gereral Exhibition censorship  rating on it. From memory alone I believe it was printed by the mid to late printer of 20th Century Fox posters Royalstone Prints Pty Ltd 


    Hondo


    David said -
    GON was Columbia, so more likely a Burton, printed with a Not Suitable?




    This is the Poster I was talking about.
    Note the For General Exhibition rating and the printers name being Royalstone Prints Pty Ltd. 

    image


    Hondo


  • Ohhhhh, sorry thought you were talking about the elusive colour one
  • Invaders From Mars was originally a Hoyts / IFD release along with New Faces. They were originally released as a double bill.Don't know about New faces as I have never seen any Australian paper at all to comment on but it is possible there was no colour daybill for Invaders From Mars.Please someone prove otherwise as there has to be a better daybill than this title for  such a  well known cult sci-fi film.


    image

    Hondo




  • There are a lot of similar daybills for B grade films where no full colour daybill has been seen. Some of the serials like King of the Rocketmen and Sci Fi titles like Snow Creature, etc where no full colour daybills have turned up. Some collectors think they must be reissues because the art is so bad but I am inclined to think that they just printed a cheap duotone daybill for some of these films and no full colour daybill was ever printed. Note that this didn't occur with all B grade or Sci Fi films, just some of them. 

  • John said:

    There are a lot of similar daybills for B grade films where no full colour daybill has been seen. Some of the serials like King of the Rocketmen and Sci Fi titles like Snow Creature, etc where no full colour daybills have turned up. Some collectors think they must be reissues because the art is so bad but I am inclined to think that they just printed a cheap duotone daybill for some of these films and no full colour daybill was ever printed. Note that this didn't occur with all B grade or Sci Fi films, just some of them. 



    I agree with John with his comments. When deciding to purchase a duotone daybill or  even a one sheet they could either be a re-issue, a second printing when stock runs out or in the case of the independent distributors  a cheaply produced re-release. The only major distributor that I believe printed first release duotone daybills was Paramount in the 1950's with some titles they distributed in Australia including Godzilla. Of interest the Bride Of The Gorilla original Ray films daybill is in colour  but when the company went out of business the films rights were obtained by RFD who produced a duotone daybill for a title now in their back catalogue.as I doubt that the film would have had an official re-release.


    Hondo

  • edited June 2015
    image

    image

    image
  • edited June 2015
    image

    image

    image
  • I knew I had one other reason for not wanting a Metropolis...
  • Interesting Sentimental Journey re-release poster. The Alaska Highway may have been first release or a re-release also. Note the two different censorship ratings on the poster, these being For General Exhibition for Sentimental Journey and G for Alaska Highway

    I'm wondering David if you would like to post this poster image on my Bite Of The Gogilla / Blackboard Jungle thread where we talk about the scarceness of double bill Australian posters and this would serve as another example.


    Hondo

  • The Metropolis daybill was produced for the 1951 re-release in Australia  by National Films Of N.S.W. They most likely were a one man operation and their limited product at that time was physically distributed throughout Australia by Independent Film Distributers ( IFD ).

    One would imagine their budget to distribute an old silent film didn't include very much money to spend on posters. It's a matter of love me or leave me.


    Hondo






  • This thread is pure gold. I want almost everything I saw!!!!!!!!
  • 110x75 said:
    This thread is pure gold. I want almost everything I saw!!!!!!!!
    Yep fool's gold!
Sign In or Register to comment.






Logo

For movie poster collectors who know...

@ 2025 Vintage Movie Posters Forum, All rights reserved.

Contact us

info@vintagemoviepostersforum.com

Get In Touch