Restoration Feedback - should fold lines still be visible?
So I recently sent in a couple of posters for restoration and linen backing.
I got them back, and I was admittedly disappointed a bit with the still noticeable fold lines on one of the posters (poster had been folded in quarters).
Perhaps my expectations are unrealistic? Or maybe it's challenging to make it unnoticeable due to the lack of detail in that area?
Any thoughts?
The restorer is highly regarded on this forum and i won't name any names until some folks chime in.
The corners look pretty good unless you look really closely, I am just surprised about the fold lines still being visible.
Outside of that, I think it's a pretty good job.
Sorry the after photo isn't the greatest, so it's less visible than looking at it in hand....
Before

After

I got them back, and I was admittedly disappointed a bit with the still noticeable fold lines on one of the posters (poster had been folded in quarters).
Perhaps my expectations are unrealistic? Or maybe it's challenging to make it unnoticeable due to the lack of detail in that area?
Any thoughts?
The restorer is highly regarded on this forum and i won't name any names until some folks chime in.
The corners look pretty good unless you look really closely, I am just surprised about the fold lines still being visible.
Outside of that, I think it's a pretty good job.
Sorry the after photo isn't the greatest, so it's less visible than looking at it in hand....
Before

After

0
Comments
There will be some modest presence of lines when they are retouched - it's unavoidable.
I see faint ones onthe images you've posted, so if that's to be expected then that's fine.
Again, overall I am pretty happy with the results, just wanted to temper my expectations with what typical results were for fold lines.
@Charlie - that restoration is excellent work!
i got lucky with the mouth of eastwood on this touchup.
i got a really good match and layering and it turned out nicely. But certainly still visible up close.
D
overall, the lines were minimized very nicely. Zoom in, their present. ....David once referred to restoration as "camouflage" It's helped me keep my expectations in check.
But more than that, you WANT to see traces of the folds! Because if you don't, it is a virtual guarantee that not only has the entire background been airbrushed over, and but the poster has also been sprayed with a clear coating to make the new paint not reflect differently from the rest of the poster.
What you end up with is a poster that was "dipped in paint", and there is NO other hobby that values this kind of restoration, and I believe that it is just a matter of time before this hobby shuns it too.
Then WHY is it done? It is mostly used by auction houses that sell to people who know nothing about movie posters. The poster displays great, and that is all they care about.
Here is a handy checklist to help tell eMoviePoster.com apart from all other major auctions!
Looking at your before, I actually think you see very little, which is a mark of a good restorer.
Generally we go down the restoration route to preserve the poster as it has condition issues. Its not to make it look brand new. There are collectors who hate looking at folds and do it for aesthetics but these things are supposed to look like they had a life in my opinion. Less is definitely more in this instance!
It's a gorgeous poster you have there, and from I can see your restorer did a great job! Hopefully you can look at it and admire its beauty...I know I do.