Most Laughable Censorship Ever?

HONDO · September 2015

Image: http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn34/Z6T7777/keep-calm-cause-you-ain-t-seen-nothing-yet-41_zps7yotjg4u.png

Coming very soon is some of the most laughable censorship ever applied to movie posters and it isn't Australian or New Zealand. I assure you will be amused once you see it.

HONDO · September 2015

Cover Up ( 1949 ) Far Top two images are U.S. 3 sheets & the just above two U.S.one sheet images have in each case the original artwork plus the same poster heavily censored.

Let's start with the 3 sheet. On the original there are three hand guns. On the 2nd poster censorship has William Bendix's gun blacked out, Dennis O'Keefe's gun turned into a telephone and the gun on the ground changed into a genie lamp.

The U.S. one sheets immediately above shows the original one sheet first with three hand guns depicted. On the image just above here is the censored version. William Bendix holding a threatening piece of paper, Dennis O'Keefe as the one armed man and the apparently dead man on the ground holding his prize possession, his hat.

According to eMovieposter.com the censoring likely occurred in Canada where they censored out almost every gun that was shown on a poster.

I would like to hear from Chris on if he can confirm this type of censoring happened and what he can inform us about on this matter. Be it be Canada which I am sure it is or some where else this is the most amusing censorship I have ever seen. Does Anyone else agree?

Sven · September 2015

The genie lamp is hilarious!

Pancho · September 2015

Oh. My. God.

theartofmovieposters · September 2015

Sven said:

The genie lamp is hilarious!

Agree!

[Deleted User] · September 2015

The genie lamp and telephone certainly are hilarious! And go right along with typical Canadian humor so why not?

David · September 2015

Sven said:

The genie lamp is hilarious!

:rofl:

Pancho · April 2016

I've come across a daybill with a remarkably stupid rating label - I just wonder if anyone has seen a stupid rating label they'd care to share?

HONDO · April 2016

Pancho said:

I've come across a daybill with a remarkably stupid rating label - I just wonder if anyone has seen a stupid rating label they'd care to share?

Can we see your example?

Bruce · April 2016

Lawrence, I have sold many tens of thousands of posters that originated in Canada, and I can assure you that either all, or the vast majority of this particular kind of censorship originated there (I know for certain).

What is very sad is that they used a specific type of black ink that completely bonds in to the paper. I have seen restorers able to lighten it, but never remove it, so to restore it, it must be painted over.

But as I say on many of these when I auction them, depending on how you look at it, this can either be a major detraction or a cool addition!

Bruce · April 2016

The censors hated guns, knives, and too much female flesh. This is probably the most frequently censored one-sheet I have encountered.

Image: http://www.emovieposter.com/images/moviestars/20081021/550/beast_with_1000000_eyes_JA01802_L.jpg

Bruce · April 2016

P.S. Note the Canadian censor stamp in the top right.

HONDO · April 2016

You must have enjoyed the Cover Up posters I previously posted then.

Bruce · April 2016

HONDO said:

You must have enjoyed the Cover Up posters I previously posted then.

I do now, and did when I first auctioned them in 2007 and 2013.

When I auctioned the censored one, I graded it as "fair" and described its condition this way:

"Note that this poster has been censored! It likely occurred in Canada, because the vast majority of posters with censor paint like this have originated in Canada, where they were crazy about censoring out images that were deemed either "too sexy" or "too violent", and that generally included almost any gun that was shown. On this poster, they covered up one gun, turned the gun on the floor into a genie lamp (!) and O'Keefe is now holding a phone! Depending on how you look at it, this is either a huge defect or kind of a neat curiosity but know that the censor paint most likely cannot be removed."

David · April 2016

Seeing censorship like that is kind of cute all these years later.

Pancho · April 2016

Image: https://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/uploads/editor/4o/sn3mpuns2tol.jpg

Nothing too strange so far - dodgy sexploitation film, R rating. But look at the yellow label:

Image: https://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/uploads/editor/hh/61qkofpylk8s.jpg

WTF?? So I can take my 5 year old son in with me?? Can't imagine this style of rating lasted too long!

Sven · April 2016

I was thinking the same re: my 5yr old...OMG!

theartofmovieposters · April 2016

HAHAHAHAHA...funny!

Rich · April 2016

I had a DOA lobby card where they removed the gun Ed O'Brien was holding and replaced it with a wad of money

HONDO · April 2016

Rich said:

I had a DOA lobby card where they removed the gun Ed O'Brien was holding and replaced it with a wad of money

Just had a look and very amusing indeed.

Bruce · April 2016

There are a zillion of these in my auction history.

Sometimes the censors did a great job, and other times...

Consider this example:

Apparently, the portion of the image that showed a sexy scantily clad Susan Hayward and the tagline ("For this woman, he broke God's own Commandment!") was just "too much" for that particular theater in those much more innocent times!

Bruce · April 2016

Or how about this one:

Image: http://www.emovieposter.com/images/moviestars/20040601/550/captains_table.jpg

Bruce · April 2016

Note that in both cases above, they carefully censored one sexy image, but ignored another! Weird.

David · April 2016

In the Captains Table both female images were 'adjusted'

HONDO · April 2016

David · April 2016

Yep, that's what I was thinking.

Bruce · April 2016

David said:

In the Captains Table both female images were 'adjusted'

I did not look close enough! But it still is odd they did not also give the second girl a one piece.

David · April 2016

Bruce said:

David said:

In the Captains Table both female images were 'adjusted'

I did not look close enough! But it still is odd they did not also give the second girl a one piece.

Very true.

Most Laughable Censorship Ever?

Comments

Contact us

Get In Touch