Best Of
Re: Australian Daybills comprehensive Video on YouTube
Forty two discussion entries were added to the forum threads yesterday. There were fifteen submitted by me and twenty seven by various other forum members. This would have to be the highest number of posts surely to the forum ever. 
HONDO
1
Re: Hondo's Daybill and One Sheet Q&A [Re-Titled]
I think your reasoning is sound. Films often change their title before they get released. The original title may not have tested well, or confused people...Americans!!!!!!
Re: Rare Australian Posters Of Australian Films
HONDO said:A question Peter is when you worked on the 1986 made for television film Army Wives did you perchance get to meet any of the actors that appeared in the film? I am thinking not as you work would seem to have been post shooting, but one can only ask.
Two of my good friends John and Mary Spicer, who were husband and wife in real life appeared in the film where they also played husband and wife. They were friends with the film's director Denny Lawrence who they worked with on sone other of his film and television directed films.dedeposter said:Phillip Quast is the only one I remember interacting with.
HONDO
1
Re: Rare Australian Posters Of Australian Films
So sad. Hopefully his work can live on through his posters, and you may be as kind in include some of the images here,
The one sheets that I have images of are for Man Of Flowes, My First Wife, Lonely Hearts and Cactus. There is one other unconfirmed title waiting to be confirmed as being an original one sheet,
The one sheets that I have images of are for Man Of Flowes, My First Wife, Lonely Hearts and Cactus. There is one other unconfirmed title waiting to be confirmed as being an original one sheet,
HONDO
1
Re: Hondo's Daybill and One Sheet Q&A [Re-Titled]

Both the above posters were printed for the U.S.A., with the American distributor New Line Cinema credited on both posters. I believe that the above first featured black background image is only advance pre release artwork printed before the second above official release titled changed one sheet was produced. I will hold back on revealing some other information to support this, hoping firstly that I hear from anyone agreeing or disagreeing with this thinking.
HONDO
1
Re: John’s Nail Biting Announcement…
Isn't this just another example of what already know? Aussie posters are nuts:
https://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/discussion/1352/slightly-different-daybill-versions-of-same-design
https://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/discussion/1352/slightly-different-daybill-versions-of-same-design
Re: Yeah, so, I am watching this..,
Thanks for responding Ves. Warwick works well with children, My friend spoke to him after the screening. I just listened. He is a down to earth person.
HONDO
1
Re: Hondo's Daybill and One Sheet Q&A [Re-Titled]
More fascinating reading and images, thanks.
Rick
1
Re: John’s Nail Biting Announcement…
Its not overprinted. If you compare the cloud at the top left on both posters, you can see where that is slightly cropped on the shorter version. So, about one inch has been cropped leaving the "...Remember he's on your side" text closer to the top heading text. They are two different printings.dedeposter said:Is the text of "...Remember he's on your side" (and don't get me started on the punctuation of that line!), Is it overprinted with white ink, or is it the absence of blue ink that creates the text? If it's white ink then it may have been added in a separate pass and been slightly misaligned during a second pass through the printer (but still doesn't answer other differences).
John
1

