Best Of

HONDO said:

In my original statement I had said ''In my opinion only I believe ......'' 

Semantics, you make it clear you are feel you are right and the evidence you presented backed up your claims. And further, then Bruce went on to make this point:

Bruce said:

So if the poster is indeed from 1949, what next? Is the unnamed buyer just out of luck? Of does the unnamed seller have any responsibility for making an error of this proportions.

Incidentally, I absolutely would have been fooled by this poster, UNLESS I had Lawrence to find this out.

So, let's assume EMP sold the poster (which we know they didn't) and you made these findings and NO ONE challenged them then Bruce (who 'would have been fooled by this poster') would have contacted the buyer to offer him his money back.

Without absolute proof then all it is is supposition and conjecture.

I would remind everyone that a whole lot of over thinking went into this thread which in the end was a simple answer that came from the horse's mouth, one of which was that 'printer's make mistakes' - not suggesting it is the case here.