Best Of
Re: Is the Movie Poster hobby expanding, contracting or Staying the same
You can't look at it in an across-the-board way. Some areas are way up, some way down, some holding steady, etc.
The biggest trend I see is the same it always was, that while true classics of any era generally hold strong, lesser older material tends to decline. You see this most strongly in things like 1940s B-Westerns (people like Eddie Dean or Whip Wilson), where there are almost no people alive who even remember them, and the posters are photographic and uninspiring.
And of course some areas keep defying the naysayers and rise more and more. Just a year after most collectors were shocked by a Jaws one-sheet selling for $1,000, one goes for $3,700 (but admittedly it was rolled and just about perfect). Will it be a $10,000 poster one day?
But here is what I see as the biggest change. Many years ago, it was hard to find ANY old movie paper, so people would "settle" for lesser items (both in terms of content and condition), because they often couldn't find much else.
But NOW, there is so much material out there (obviously at auction, but also from dealers the world over) that hardly anyone sees any reason to settle for a lesser item, when they can surely find something else they want more, and in just a matter of days.
So I am seeing lots of items selling for just a few dollars each that might have sold for much more ten years back. But of course remember that asking prices don't equate to selling prices. Just because dealers were asking $20 each for lots of items that now sell for $1 to $5 each doesn't mean hardly any were ever really selling at $20.
But here is what I see as the biggest change. Many years ago, it was hard to find ANY old movie paper, so people would "settle" for lesser items (both in terms of content and condition), because they often couldn't find much else.
But NOW, there is so much material out there (obviously at auction, but also from dealers the world over) that hardly anyone sees any reason to settle for a lesser item, when they can surely find something else they want more, and in just a matter of days.
So I am seeing lots of items selling for just a few dollars each that might have sold for much more ten years back. But of course remember that asking prices don't equate to selling prices. Just because dealers were asking $20 each for lots of items that now sell for $1 to $5 each doesn't mean hardly any were ever really selling at $20.
And on the other end, I have never seen a stronger time for top items in nice condition. Looking at recent results it is clear that collectors are willing to go the extra mile and pay record prices for exactly the right items.
Bruce
6
Re: Simmons RKO Full Bleed Daybill Posters Incorrecly Trimmed.
Yes we need more threads on the same subject.
David
1
Re: Leading Actors: Bogart- Dead Reckoning vs. Grant- Suspicion
Lizabeth definitely has the bad girl vibe going, especially with the requisite noir cigarette in her hand, but as a whole, Dead Reckoning comes in second poster-wise.
Re: Rare and unusual posters that are not wall worthy.
Because there are three owners who pay for the site and none of them is called Zuckerburg, donate to the cause or use a free photo hosting service.HONDO said:darolo said:Bruce is right, I've noticed on some threads there is no inserting an image, only the image URL option.
It happens on a reasonable number of threads that this is the case.
OR if the image is hosted already on the internet, right click the image, click 'Copy Image', then come in here and right click/paste.
David
1
Re: Wil's under house find
The Hockey Champ ( 1939 ) is another Donald Duck long daybill. Posters of this type are very few in number it appears.
HONDO
1
Re: Wil's under house find
Ha ha. What makes things worse is the fact that the poster was originally a long daybill, and who knows if a rare Donald Duck title was originally printed on It.collectahollic said:A crying shame Donald Duck was missing his legs (must have upset Pluto!)
HONDO
1
Get In Touch
